Blog Posts

Hardware and Communication Advancements

This week marked a strong step forward in both our hardware development and wireless communication integration. The project remains on schedule as we transition from early prototyping into testing and validation phases.

On the electrical side, we finalized Version 1 of our PCB. The board has officially been designed and ordered, representing a major milestone as we move beyond breadboarding toward a more integrated and reliable system. We also successfully established a working connection between the Arduino and the LoRa module, laying the groundwork for long-range wireless communication capabilities.

From a mechanical standpoint, multiple enclosure concepts and snap-attachment mechanisms were 3D modeled and sent to print. These iterations will allow us to evaluate fit, durability, and ease of use while gathering feedback from stakeholders.

In the coming week, our focus will shift toward performance testing and coordination. We will begin evaluating actuator effectiveness to determine whether upgrades are necessary to meet project requirements. Mechanical prototyping will continue as we print multiple enclosure variations for shipment to FDOT.

On the communications side, we plan to establish a verified connection between two LoRa modules to ensure reliable device-to-device transmission. We will also coordinate with Road Response to confirm successful communication integration with their system.

Additionally, we will work closely with Road Response and our liaisons to schedule and confirm joint testing sessions.

Moving Right Along

Over the past week, our team made solid progress across electrical, mechanical, and planning aspects of the project, keeping us firmly on schedule.

On the electrical side, we successfully completed breadboard circuit testing for both the light and sound actuators. This milestone gave us confidence in the core functionality of our system and informed our next design steps. To support continued prototyping, we also ordered additional components, ensuring we’ll have what we need as we transition toward PCB development.

From a mechanical perspective, multiple enclosure prototypes were modeled, giving us a strong starting point for physical iteration. These designs will soon move from the screen to the printer, allowing us to gather feedback.

We also took time to step back and plan ahead. Clear objectives have been established for our in-class project workday next week. We also began preliminary work on the Final Design Review (FDR) outline, setting the stage for a final presentation.

In the coming week, we’ll continue testing and validating electrical components, with a strong emphasis on refining the breadboard designs and finalizing PCB layouts for ordering early next week. Results from our initial tests will be reviewed carefully to guide final circuit decisions. On the mechanical side, we plan to 3D print multiple enclosure variants and collect feedback from our liaisons to guide design improvements.

QRB 1!!

This week marked an important checkpoint in the project with the successful completion of Qualification Review Board 1 (QRB1). The team presented the QRB1 material the overall presentation went very well. Following the review, evaluated the feedback and completed a QRB1 feedback response memo to document our planned actions and adjustments moving forward.

On the technical front, most of the ordered electrical components arrived, allowing us to shift from planning into hands-on work. With components now in lab, the team began preliminary electrical testing. We are focusing on verifying basic functionality and familiarizing ourselves with components.

Next week, efforts will intensify around electrical testing and validation. The team will continue testing individual components while also breadboarding individual subsystems. This will be followed by full system breadboarding. Results from this testing phase will guide final circuit decisions, enabling us to finalize the circuit design with confidence.

By the end of next week, the goal is to order the PCB, marking a major transition from prototyping to a more integrated hardware solution. Once the PCB is ordered, planning efforts will begin shifting toward mechanical housing design.

The Awearables at QRB 1.

The Awearables preparing for QRB 1.

QRB Preparation Underway

This week marked a major milestone in our project timeline as we officially began preparations for Qualification Review Board 1 (QRB1), scheduled for January 27. With QRB1 approaching, the team focused on aligning our technical progress, documentation, and presentation materials to clearly communicate the state of the project.

A significant portion of the week was spent drafting the QRB1 project summary document and carefully reviewing the QRB1 rubric to ensure our deliverables meet expectations. We also began outlining and developing the QRB1 presentation. On the hardware side, we placed orders for key electrical components needed for early prototyping and validation, setting the stage for hands-on testing in the coming weeks.

Next week will be an important transition from planning to execution. The team will complete and present QRB1, incorporating any final refinements before the review. Once the ordered components arrive, we will begin assembling initial circuits on breadboards and conducting electrical validation testing to confirm basic functionality. These results will help determine our readiness to move forward with PCB design and assess whether PCB ordering is feasible the following week.

The student rubric for QRB 1.

Return of the Jedi’s – Spring Week 1

The FDOT Awearables team is back together! Getting right back into it, we switched roles, attended a guest lecture on the engineering standard of care, and created a critical path for the semester. The main focus of the week was preparing a plan for the semester so that we can ensure that we finish our deliverable on time. The first item on our radar moving into next week is the qualification review board (QRB) happening at the end of January. We look forward to a great semester!

The first team meeting of the semester with all members (Gehres Sakadales, Emilio Avendano, Jackson Abrams, Matthew Brown, Matthew Gutierrez, Stephanie Baldwin, and Tyler Senkowicz). 

System Level Design Review – Fall Week 14

This week, we gave our System Level Design Review presentation to an audience filled with our liaisons, sponsors, and other students and IPPD faculty. It has been a long and challenging semester, but it felt great to step up there as a team and give our halfway presentation for the project we’ve already spent many nights staying up late and tired to ensure its success.

Thank you to our liaisons Lee Woodcock, Bertho Augustin, Camila Garcia-Ferryra, our sponsor Jordan Green at FDOT, and everyone else who has helped us along the way and shown us guidance. We are excited to get started on building next semester!

Tagged as:

Refining the Vision – FALL WEEK 13

This week, our team made significant progress as we moved closer to the System Level Design Review (SLDR). We finished the draft of the SLDR report and presentation, summarizing our system architecture, prototype functionality, and overall design direction. With the core content prepared, we participated in the SLDR peer review, where we delivered a full presentation and demonstrated the current capabilities of our prototype. The feedback we received from peers was constructive and helped highlight areas for improvement before the formal review.

Alongside presentation work, the team continued developing supporting documentation, including the software design description, functional description, and interface specifications. We also finalized the manufacturing plan for large-scale hardware production and completed the outline for our electrical and mechanical testing procedures. These components will guide the next stage of development as we transition from early prototyping into more structured evaluation.

Looking ahead to the next week, our focus will shift to refining the SLDR presentation based on peer feedback. The team plans to restructure several slides to highlight device capability, project risks, and quality objectives while reducing text in favor of visuals and demonstrations. We will also begin practicing the presentation in person to finalize timing and ensure smooth transitions between sections.

Overall, the project remains on schedule, and the progress made this week has positioned us well for a strong showing at the upcoming SLDR.

Tagged as:

Wiring It Together – FALL WEEK 12

This week, our team continued refining the details of our system as we prepare for the upcoming System-Level Design Review (SLDR). We updated the hardware description, electrical interfaces, and housing considerations to ensure everything stays aligned with our system requirements. As material options became more defined, we also started thinking about how those choices would influence component placement, wiring paths, and general protection of the internal electronics.

A major focus for the team was beginning our prototype and experimental testing plans. We outlined the tests needed to verify core functions such as alert behavior, power stability, and communication reliability, and identified the equipment and procedures we’ll use during the first round of evaluations. We also continued developing our manufacturing plan, including steps for soldering, mounting components inside the enclosure, and coordinating wiring layouts with the mechanical design.

Throughout the week, we emphasized coordination across electrical, mechanical, and software efforts to make sure all parts of the system integrate smoothly. Planning ahead for testing, even while some design elements were still in progress, helped us identify potential gaps early and prepare for a more efficient prototyping stage. Moving forward, we’ll focus on completing the electrical and mechanical testing plans and finalizing our contributions to the SLDR report and presentation.

Tagged as:

Showtime! (at PID) – Fall Week 11

This week marked an exciting milestone as we completed our initial prototype and presented it at Prototype Inspection Day (PID). After weeks of design, testing, and iteration, it was rewarding to finally showcase a functional demonstration of our wearable alert system. The event gave us the opportunity to share our progress and design rationale with judges, faculty, and peers from across disciplines.

PID also allowed us to highlight the thought process behind our engineering decisions, from concept development to hardware integration and communication design. Engaging with reviewers from different backgrounds provided valuable perspective on usability, reliability, and real-world application. The discussions helped validate our approach while offering new directions to guide improvements as we move into the next phase of development.

The Awearables presenting our first prototype at PID.

Moving forward, our team plans to apply the feedback received at PID to refine the design and functionality of our prototype. We will focus on improving attachment stability, optimizing communication performance between devices, and enhancing overall system durability. These updates will help ensure the next iteration of our prototype is better suited for real-world conditions and aligns more closely with the needs of our end users.

Tagged as:

Loading… – FALL WEEK 10

This week continued our preparation for the Prototype Inspection Day, where we’ll be giving a brief presentation to a panel of judges demonstrating basic functionality for how our product may work.

Soldered board

Our team has been busy creating 3D models and beginning to 3D print, and configuring the Arduino board to try and receive the signal from Team 6 to activate some actuators on our end. While the board has already been soldered and some basic code has been implemented to have the board react (likely through an LED) after a button is pressed.

The challenge of how to ensure the reliable and fail-safe delivery of alerts over the range of a mile persists. However, we hope to receive some valuable feedback from the panel of experts during the prototype inspection.

Tagged as: